As AI advances in text generation, human trust in AI generated content remains constrained by biases that go beyond concerns of accuracy. This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content. Through three experiments involving text rephrasing, news article summarization, and persuasive writing, we investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content. While the raters could not differentiate the two types of texts in the blind test, they overwhelmingly favored content labeled as "Human Generated," over those labeled "AI Generated," by a preference score of over 30%. We observed the same pattern even when the labels were deliberately swapped. This human bias against AI has broader societal and cognitive implications, as it undervalues AI performance. This study highlights the limitations of human judgment in interacting with AI and offers a foundation for improving human-AI collaboration, especially in creative fields.

Lighthouses play a crucial role in ensuring maritime safety by signaling hazardous areas such as dangerous coastlines, shoals, reefs, and rocks, along with aiding harbor entries and aerial navigation. This is achieved through the use of photoresistor sensors that activate or deactivate based on the time of day. However, a significant issue is the potential malfunction of these sensors, leading to the gradual misalignment of the light's operational timing. This paper introduces an innovative machine learning-based approach for automatically detecting such malfunctions. We evaluate four distinct algorithms: decision trees, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and multi-layer perceptron. Our findings indicate that the multi-layer perceptron is the most effective, capable of detecting timing discrepancies as small as 10-15 minutes. This accuracy makes it a highly efficient tool for automating the detection of faults in lighthouse light sensors.